1
Where Precision and Accuracy Meet
News:
NEW USERS MUST CONTACT RICKPOLLOCK@SHAW.CA BEFORE LISTING ITEMS FOR SALE
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Links To international Benchrest Organisations
« on: February 13, 2011, 10:47:10 PM »
Finland http://www.benchrest.fi/view.php
3
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Bullets
« on: January 07, 2011, 04:11:15 AM »
Dan,
John VM summed it up pretty good!
There are few fellers in Scandinavia using your 68 FBs in national & intl. level and are doing pretty good with em'. Personally i've shot only Bart's 65 BTs which were made to .790" J4 jackets. Don't know the situation nowadays. In the beginning i didn't have any reference for bullets. At the time i looked statistics and decided to order BTs which seemed to be in the top of the equipment lists. I tried the FBs also, but find BTs seats smoother as stated earlier. Todays thin neck brass, N133 and hard neck tension + FBs aren't the best measuringwisely (if you measure the loaded cartridge). How much that effects in tight PPC chamber... Really don't know, you'll see the results on target i suppose. For 90% of competition shooters it's about personal believes, really don't think anyone have hard data between FBs or BTs.
Main thing is that you test, test, test your equipment, develope a well tuned load and you trust your equipment with a whole heart. Aggs are what we are shooting, not groups...
That's my 2 cent...
PS. Could there be a some kind of connection with fat BT bullets and growing .237" barrel bore diameter...
John VM summed it up pretty good!
There are few fellers in Scandinavia using your 68 FBs in national & intl. level and are doing pretty good with em'. Personally i've shot only Bart's 65 BTs which were made to .790" J4 jackets. Don't know the situation nowadays. In the beginning i didn't have any reference for bullets. At the time i looked statistics and decided to order BTs which seemed to be in the top of the equipment lists. I tried the FBs also, but find BTs seats smoother as stated earlier. Todays thin neck brass, N133 and hard neck tension + FBs aren't the best measuringwisely (if you measure the loaded cartridge). How much that effects in tight PPC chamber... Really don't know, you'll see the results on target i suppose. For 90% of competition shooters it's about personal believes, really don't think anyone have hard data between FBs or BTs.
Main thing is that you test, test, test your equipment, develope a well tuned load and you trust your equipment with a whole heart. Aggs are what we are shooting, not groups...
That's my 2 cent...
PS. Could there be a some kind of connection with fat BT bullets and growing .237" barrel bore diameter...
Pages: [1]
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk