Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - John VM

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
41
WBSF - World Benchrest Shooting Federation Events / Re: WBC Qualifying
« on: November 03, 2013, 04:45:43 PM »
 Calvin, you have stated your opinion and made a good argument, others have come and stated their opinion and made a good argument. Why after reading both sides would you give up if you thought their needs to be improvement. We all understand that there could be improvement, but sometimes it is not as simple as it looks. No one has shot you down, they are just giving you their experience in what has worked and what has not worked and why they think there are issues. Time to review and rethink of a better way.
 Now if you are insinuating that you are not going to try out for the world team because of other peoples opinions in an open discussion than you have just created your own excuse not to go. We do not even know how many are actually signing up yet! Chin up man, politics are politics, shooting is shooting. If you didn't sign up for politics than why let it bother your shooting. As they say Rome was not built in a day, and the road to glory is never a smooth one.

42
WBSF - World Benchrest Shooting Federation Events / Re: WBC Qualifying
« on: November 02, 2013, 05:43:41 PM »
 I must say that I have read all these threads with interest and that I am proud to be a Canadian.
   At this point I think before anything else gets started or decided, we should find out who is thinking of going to the World Shoot in St Louis. If I recall correctly you will need to be a member of the world team and you will have to have a passport. If I recall correctly the competitor chosen also had to come up with close to a grand for entrance fees and uniforms etc etc.. Please add anything else that applies so that everyone knows what they are getting involved into.
 I for one am considering getting back into the race, I still have some 8208 and a bunch of Watson bullets getting old. I think I even have a new barrel that I haven't tried. :)

43
 Welcome back team Canada!
 Thanks for all the pictures and reporting. Well done!

44
WBSF - World Benchrest Shooting Federation Events / Re: WBC Qualifying
« on: November 01, 2013, 06:57:29 PM »
  Calvin, I don't think you are an "a-hole" or anywhere near that. I do think a good discussion should be had on this issue and we should be able to discuss the issues without unnecessary eye poking in general.  I love the idea of a completely Canadian qualification match (Now I will show you the issue), it should be held in Alberta!or if you are in the east, Elmira! I have to agree with Vera, I have never felt or heard animosity of the westerners except maybe when Opal beat me by .010" for small group at the Super Shoot. But I got over that, eh. The issue is distance and time and face it, if the match was held in Alberta or Elmira, would you get 40 shooters total. If this was the only real qualifying match, one gun break down or lost firearm on the plane sure could ruin someones outlook of competing. This would be considered a local match in the US, but would have the time and expense of a major shoot in the US. It is more economics than anything else. Right now the west is growing but its economy is doing well also. It was not like this when Ontario was booming. Years ago I can remember going to 12 shoots a year without leaving the province but the economy was doing well and the government was not imposing ridiculous restrictions on ranges near populations. Now several have given up as the restrictions were to costly for rifle ranges to meet. Times are tough even on the American side in traditional areas of benchrest. It has been tough on all shooting sports in a lot of areas if you look around.
 I did enjoy going to the World shoot in 2005 and if you get the opportunity to go, then go out and try your best to qualify. It is an experience you will enjoy and remember all your life. How my wife put up with me for those 2 years, I do not know, but she did.
 I would again have to agree with Vera, the world teams have always been pretty close to even as far as westerners and easterners and I believe this has been a good thing, it has given us opportunity to meet each other and work together for a greater goal. When I came back from the World shoot I sure had an appreciation for all involved and felt I had gained several new friends, in western Canada, Namibia, South Africa, France, England, New Zealand... well I can't name them all.
 Let's discuss how we can make the most of these opportunities by raising money and supporting the world team so that those who do have the ability to go and are successfully competing, can go even if it may be in Australia, South Africa or New Zealand, not just a rush to the closer matches because it is the only time that I can afford.(I am not trying to single out Calvin, most of us are not in a position to to do this on our own) We should be all striving to put our best shooters forward.
 After writing all this I think Vera is doing a pretty good job of speaking on this and I am just rambling.
 To all the team members, welcome back, thanks for doing your best in representing Canada. Now go get some sleep before the jet lag catches you. :)

45
WBSF - World Benchrest Shooting Federation Events / Re: WBC Qualifying
« on: October 31, 2013, 08:08:14 PM »
"This whole team Canada thing has been a fiasco ever since Canada has been involved.  I am fielding questions about who can make the decisions that are made in regards to selecting a team."
 I would like to see the above quote explained. What fiasco are we talking about? Getting a  Canadian team started was largely due to one person in the beginning and it was a chore to get enough people interested in going, let alone organize a team and register the Canadian team with WBSF. It was through his efforts, that this all got started. He was always glad to hand over the reigns to anyone interested in doing the thankless job it is. Now through the work of others who have taken up the cause it has continued to grow in interest. I fail to see a Fiasco. Now as things grow and hopefully keep growing obviously things will change and procedures will need to be set in how we address the changes so that we do this in the best interest of promoting the sport nationally and as a nation within the international community.
 Someone can correct me if I am wrong on this but to the best of my knowledge, the members who signed up and paid their memberships to the World team are the ones who are in the position to make the rules.

46
 Wow. It must have been rough looking at the scores overall. It must get breezy in the land of Oz. Hope everyone had a good time and enjoyed their visit while they were there.

47
 Hey, those patch catchers of Opels will never work. ;D Looks like everyone is having fun. Say hi to George and Vera and good luck to you all!

48
Congratulations Calvin!

49
Photo And Video Gallery / Re: Weekend Range Project
« on: February 19, 2013, 09:04:52 PM »
 Well at least it looked good! Hope your new one works out better!

50
Photo And Video Gallery / Re: Weekend Range Project
« on: February 17, 2013, 11:36:14 AM »
 Hey Cal, how did the bench and range turn out?

51
Club Events / Re: MRGC January Match
« on: January 25, 2013, 05:28:17 PM »
  Having competed in both scoring systems, they both are fun but with the 10 + x scoring the fun ends and you are just wasting bullets if you shoot a nine at 100 yds. The 11 point system allows you to dig and claw your way back into competition and and be competitive till the end.
 In score shooting I think it is better to keep the competition competitive till the end as more people will stick around and enjoy, instead of packing up when a 9 happens.  As Bill has stated before, when they hosted shoots with the x system only the die hard BR shooters will show up, when you use the 11 system everybody starts to show up.

52
Club Events / Re: MRGC January Match
« on: January 24, 2013, 07:07:33 PM »
 The perfect target would be a 55 and a perfect agg would be 275

53
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Powder For 6ppc
« on: January 07, 2013, 04:54:12 PM »
 When T powder came out it was a military surplus powder and for some it was not a great powder, but for those that figured it out, it was the powder to beat. This was when everyone was shooting the Scottish 322 and it was the powder to beat.
 The Canadian 2015 meters very well, better than 133, and this was one of the assets of 8208.
 When 322 started falling out of favor, the color changed from grey black to a greenish grey and became temperamental and hot in some conditions. My personal feeling is that they used to coat the powder with graphite which was to make it meter better but it also was a deterrent which took the edge of the temperamental or pressure  spike. 4198 was notorious for shooting well but it was usually a hot load and when things went bad it went bad fast. Benchmark always showed promise when I was shooting it but I gave up on it as it performed ok but never great.

54
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Powder For 6ppc
« on: January 06, 2013, 11:58:27 AM »
Look for some of the new Canadian made aa2015 powder. I bought a lb and it looks promising. It will say made in Canada right on the side of the bottle.

55
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Eastern Ontario Benchrest Clubs?
« on: December 28, 2012, 06:01:54 PM »
 That is bad news as the Oshawa club was a great place to shoot and they even built a nice loading building and everything.

56
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Fish bowl ranges
« on: December 27, 2012, 05:06:13 PM »
 Well, I know there are more successful shooters than I at this type of shooting. I will tell of a few things I have observed.
1) Usually the first 30 yds the wind direction is the most important
2) mirage is very helpful in reading the last 30 yds
3) sometimes their is one predominant flag and it is the one you mainly have to watch.
 With everything you have to take the into account the way things are laid out such as berms, lanes and tree density etc.

57
Centerfire Discussions / Fish bowl ranges
« on: December 23, 2012, 10:52:29 AM »
 Ranges that are enclosed by dirt walls or trees usually are called fish bowl ranges and create some highly improbable wind patterns across the field. This is becoming more and more the norm because of more and more restrictions on rifle ranges as time goes.
 What do you do when all the flags in front of you never settle into a pattern but are doing all different things at different velocities? How successful were you using the technique or pattern you look for? Do you run them or pick?

58
About This Forum / Re: 3 Yrs!
« on: December 23, 2012, 10:40:52 AM »
 Thanks Rick and great job!

59
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Eastern Ontario Benchrest Clubs?
« on: December 19, 2012, 06:04:03 PM »
 They used to have matches in the Oshawa area which would be a little closer. Not sure if they still do or not.It was a great place to shoot, I got one of my first trophy's there!

60
Centerfire Discussions / Re: sorting brass by case weight?
« on: December 17, 2012, 08:25:54 PM »
Take a couple of the really light ones and a couple of the heaviest ones and mix them up. Load and shoot them in a group and then shoot some that you have carefully weighed into a group. I have personally not been able to see a difference of 2 grains in a ppc sized case. If you can see what 4 grains difference in mag cases will do I would be surprised. Half this game is if you believe it makes a difference than it does make a difference. Case wall variation has more of a bearing on accuracy and the quality of the brass to withstand pressure and reloading is usually bigger issues. Lapua  usually has the advantage here but it never hurts to check.
 Did you weigh the cases after you sized and trimmed them?

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk