1121
Centerfire Discussions / Re: Participation
« on: February 01, 2010, 09:08:58 PM »
Spencer what range do you shoot at?
Rick
Rick
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Also what about reloading components like powder and primers? I'm sure I'll have to have them on the form. Yes-No?
Cheers
Greg
rpollock a big tanks for the inside with the contact here in estrie. Very appreciate !
For, your question a fire formed case have a .244 too the neck.
The guy who want too sell me the rifle have also tell me that the trigger is a Canjar adjustable for 1oz too 4lbs. With the deal i have a custom set trigger from brownells and 500 bullets sierra of 52 grain.
With this rifle and some pratice i hope i will be competite in the bench match next summer.
I have see what some bench guys are able too do and this is incredible.
I have a question for you guys: your rifle is glue-in or screw in the stock ?
Thank you for your welcome guys
Rick that was 09 winners
Hello All,
My first post and a lot of questions.
I am currently putting together a 6ppc rifle for br shooting.
I'm new to 6ppc,so have some reloading questions.
I have an arbor press and a standard press to load on.
I've got the 6ppc cases necked down to .262.
The barrel I will be using is a Mclennan 13.5 twist.
I'm pretty well open on dies and bullets and any other tools I may need.
I was thinking trying the Berger 68gr.Match FB bullets to start with.
I've also used the Wilson Neck sizing and seating dies and was thinking of buying a pair of those.
Yes, I am a newbie and welcome all advice.
Thanks,
Derrick
Hey R and R, thanks for a new idea for my new varmint rifle......
I was talked into a 20 PPC but now I am thinking 20 PPC Short or maybe a 20 Waldog..... If there is boiler room why don't I just shorten the case to make sure we get good load density....
What powder is the norm for the 22PPC short or Waldog?
Calvin
Great minds think alike??? Are you going with a no turn neck? I had originally had that in mind but have since changed my idea. I'm going to stick with the .242"Read that .246 neck not enough coffe this morning for the brain cells to have warmed up!!!
Rick,
I think I put that wrong. I meant to say a smaller percentage of rifles would have been capable of agging in the teens. I'm sure we agree on that. Where we disagree is that I think they were technically capable of doing so but the shooter's expectations were a bit lower and lower expectations inevitably lead to poorer results. The point I am trying to make is that, in many respects, the equipment race is optional but shooter effort is not.
Now, Let's move on to components. Specifically, bullet design. Over the last 25 years or so, the trend has been toward bullets with longer ogives ans shorter bearing surfaces. In addition, the boattail fell out of favour entirely. Recently, there has been a bit of a resurrection of the boattail and, as well, some experimentation with shorter ogive bullets. Who likes what? Does anyone see a competitive monometal bullet in the future of the sport? Regards, Bill.